Court of Appeals Opinions

Format: 08/28/2016
Format: 08/28/2016
Newton vs. Tinsley
03A01-9706-CV-00204
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge: Harold Wimberly
Knox County Court of Appeals 12/11/97
Robin vs. Seaton
03A01-9704-CH-00146
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge: Chester S. Rainwater
Sevier County Court of Appeals 12/11/97
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge:
Roane County Court of Appeals 12/10/97
03A01-9708-CH-
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge:
Court of Appeals 12/10/97
Oneida vs. Oneida
03A01-9707-CH-00264
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge:
Court of Appeals 12/10/97
Thurman vs. Thurman
03A01-9707-CH-00261
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge:
Court of Appeals 12/10/97
Watson vs. Ameredes
03A01-9704-CV-00129
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge: John B. Hagler, Jr.
Bradley County Court of Appeals 12/10/97
Suzanne Gibson vs. James Prokell
02A01-9701-CH-00006
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge: C. Neal Small
Shelby County Court of Appeals 12/10/97
Terri Demilt vs. Methodist Hosp., et al
02A01-9611-CV-00283
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge: George H. Brown
Shelby County Court of Appeals 12/10/97
McManamay vs. McManamay
01A01-9802-CH-00081
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge:
Court of Appeals 12/10/97
James Walter Dellinger, v. The Arnold Engineering Company and Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, Larry Brinton, Jr., Director of the Second Injury Fund
03S01-9703-CV-00033
Authoring Judge: Special Judge Roger E. Thayer
Trial Court Judge: Judge William R. Holt, Jr.

This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Court of Appeals 12/09/97
Paul William McGaffic, v. Janice Elois McGaffic
03A01-9707-CV-00286
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Judge William L. Brown

This is a post-divorce case. Paul William McGaffic filed a petition seeking to modify his child support and periodic alimony in futuro obligations. As pertinent to the issues on
this appeal, the trial court refused to modify its existing child support and alimony in futuro decrees. Mr. McGaffic appealed, raising issues that essentially present the following questions: 1. Does the evidence preponderate against the trial court’s refusal to modify its alimony in futuro award by either terminating it, or reducing it and/or converting it to an award of rehabilitative alimony? 2. Does the evidence preponderate against the trial court’s refusal to modify its child support award?

Hamilton County Court of Appeals 12/09/97
Super Grip Corporation v. B & D Super Grip, Inc., - Concurring
03A01-9707-CV-00257
Authoring Judge: Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: Judge R. Jerry Beck

In this contract action, the Trial Judge entered judgment for plaintiff against defendant in the amount of $50,431.29, and dismissed defendant’s counterclaim which had sought damages for plaintiff’s alleged breach of the distributorship agreement.

Sullivan County Court of Appeals 12/09/97