Court of Appeals Opinions

Format: 05/23/2018
Format: 05/23/2018
3A01-9801-CV-00033
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge:
Sevier County Court of Appeals 06/25/98
3A01-9801-CH-00034
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge:
Court of Appeals 06/25/98
Roach vs. Renfro
03A01-9711-CH-00517
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge:
Court of Appeals 06/25/98
Hankins vs. Seaton
03A01-9710-CV-00468
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge:
Court of Appeals 06/25/98
Canonie vs. Tennessee
03A01-9710-CH-00481
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge:
Court of Appeals 06/25/98
Eblen vs. Johnson
03A01-9709-CH-00423
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge:
Court of Appeals 06/25/98
Atkins vs. Grooms
03A01-9708-JV-00337
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge:
Court of Appeals 06/25/98
Purkey vs. Purkey
03A01-9707-CV-00317
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge:
Court of Appeals 06/25/98
Stone vs. Stone
M1997-00218-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Vernon Neal
This appeal involves a former spouse's efforts to extricate himself from the spousal support obligations contained in a marital dissolution agreement. Approximately one year after the entry of the divorce decree approving the agreement, the former husband requested the Chancery Court for Putnam County to set the agreement aside because he did not have independent legal advice and his judgment was impaired by antidepressant medication when he signed the agreement. The trial court modified portions of the decree but did not relieve the former husband of his spousal support obligation. Thereafter, the former husband filed a second motion seeking to terminate or reduce his spousal support obligations because of his former wife's improved financial circumstances. The trial court again declined to relieve the former husband of his obligation to pay spousal support. On this appeal, the former husband renews his argument that he should no longer be required pay spousal support because of his former wife's improved financial circumstance and his own weakened financial condition. We affirm the trial court's decision that the former husband has failed to prove the existence of a substantial, material change in circumstances that would warrant modifying his spousal support obligation.
Putnam County Court of Appeals 06/23/98
Albert Gregurek v. Swope Motors
M2002-02854-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge: J. Curtis Smith
This case involves an interlocutory appeal from the trial court's denial of the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss on grounds of lack of personal jurisdiction and/or Motion for Summary Judgment. We reverse.
Marion County Court of Appeals 06/22/98
Lyle vs. Michaelson Asset Management
01A01-9710-CV-00549
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge: Walter C. Kurtz
Davidson County Court of Appeals 06/19/98
01A01-9606-CV-00260
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge: Henry Denmark Bell
Williamson County Court of Appeals 06/19/98
Kinney vs. Hale
01A01-9709-CV-00465
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge: Charles D. Haston, Sr.
Warren County Court of Appeals 06/19/98
01A01-9709-CH-00496
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge: Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.
Davidson County Court of Appeals 06/19/98