Court of Appeals Opinions

Format: 09/01/2014
Format: 09/01/2014
Forbes vs. Wilson Co. Emergency
01A01-9602-CH-00089
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge: C. K. Smith
Wilson County Court of Appeals 09/13/96
James v. Doramus
01A01-9603-CH-00139
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge: Henry Denmark Bell
Williamson County Court of Appeals 09/13/96
01A01-9602-CH-00054
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge: Robert S. Brandt
Davidson County Court of Appeals 09/13/96
Craig v. Gabbert
01A01-9506-CH-00274
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge: Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.
Davidson County Court of Appeals 09/13/96
02A01-9506-CH-00128
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge: George R. Ellis
Gibson County Court of Appeals 09/12/96
02A01-9504-CV-00095
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge: D'Army Bailey
Shelby County Court of Appeals 09/12/96
02A01-9504-CH-00080
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge: D. J. Alissandratos
Shelby County Court of Appeals 09/11/96
01A01-9603-CH-00125
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge: Henry Denmark Bell
Williamson County Court of Appeals 09/11/96
01A01-9511-CH-00501
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge: Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.
Davidson County Court of Appeals 09/11/96
01A01-9602-CV-00078
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge: Donald P. Harris
Williamson County Court of Appeals 09/11/96
01A01-9601-CV-00038
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge:
Court of Appeals 09/11/96
01A01-9601-CV-00038
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge: Thomas Goodall
Sumner County Court of Appeals 09/11/96
Herman Davis and wife, Darnell Davis, v. Paul A. Hatcher, Sr., M.D.
03A01-9601-CV-00016
Authoring Judge: Senior Judge William H. Inman
Trial Court Judge:

This malpractice action was dismissed on motion for summary judgment. It arose from a routine prostate resection which went awry, resulting in adverse consequences to the plaintiff. A device referred to as a resectoscope manufactured by the Circon ACMI Ohio Manufacturing Company,1 malfunctioned while being used by and under the control of the defendant, Dr. Paul Hatcher [hereafter, the “defendant”]. It is not disputed that a portion of the penis of the plaintiff, Herman Davis [hereafter, “plaintiff”], was either chemically, thermally or electrically burned away, with disastrous results unnecessary here to be recounted.

Knox County Court of Appeals 09/09/96
Herman Davis and wife, Darnell Davis, v. Paul A. Hatcher, Sr., M.D.
03A01-9601-CV-00016
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge: Senior Judge William H. Inman

This malpractice action was dismissed on motion for summary judgment. It arose from a routine prostate resection which went awry, resulting in adverse consequences to the plaintiff. A device referred to as a resectoscope manufactured by the Circon ACMI Ohio Manufacturing Company,1 malfunctioned while being used by and under the control of the defendant, Dr. Paul Hatcher [hereafter, the “defendant”]. It is not disputed that a portion of the penis of the plaintiff, Herman
Davis [hereafter, “plaintiff”], was either chemically, thermally or electrically burned away, with disastrous results unnecessary here to be recounted.

Knox County Court of Appeals 09/09/96