Court of Appeals Opinions

Format: 11/27/2014
Format: 11/27/2014
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge:
Court of Appeals 06/11/96
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge:
Sullivan County Court of Appeals 06/11/96
03A01-9603-CH-00095
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge:
Court of Appeals 06/11/96
03A01-9601-CV-00004
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge:
Court of Appeals 06/11/96
03A01-9510-BC-00355
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge:
Court of Appeals 06/11/96
02A01-9504-CV-00082
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge: Robert A. Lanier
Court of Appeals 06/11/96
02A01-9504-CH-00094
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge: Dewey C. Whitenton
Hardeman County Court of Appeals 06/11/96
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge:
Court of Appeals 06/10/96
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge:
Blount County Court of Appeals 06/10/96
03A01-9601-CH-00030
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge:
Polk County Court of Appeals 06/10/96
03A01-9510-CH-00372
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge: Inman
Court of Appeals 06/10/96
03A01-9509-CV-00332
Authoring Judge:
Trial Court Judge:
McMinn County Court of Appeals 06/10/96
Jerry T. Beech, Concrete Contractor, Inc., v. Mary Henderson
01A01-9507-CH-00308
Authoring Judge: Senior Judge William H. Williams
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.

This case concerns the payment on a contract for installation of a concrete driveway. Jerry T. Beech Concrete Contractor, Inc. (hereinafter, "Beech") filed suit against Mary Henderson (hereinafter, "Henderson") on a sworn account for nonpayment of the contract price for installing a concrete driveway and a box drain. Following a bench trial, the trial court found that Beech and Henderson had contracted to install a driveway and a box drain, but the trial court determined that Beech had installed the driveway in an unworkmanlike manner causing it to have defects. As a result, the trial court awarded Beech the contract price offset by the amount of property damage Henderson allegedly suffered. Beech appealed, and the appeal is properly before this Court. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Court of Appeals 06/07/96