Supreme Court Opinions
|
03S01-9411-CV-00110 Authoring Judge: Trial Court Judge: W. Dale Young |
Supreme Court | 12/11/95 | |||
|
03S01-9412-CR-00119 Authoring Judge: Trial Court Judge: |
Supreme Court | 12/11/95 | |||
|
03A01-9401-CV-00032 Authoring Judge: Trial Court Judge: |
Supreme Court | 11/27/95 | |||
|
03S01-9502-CV-00016 Authoring Judge: Trial Court Judge: |
Supreme Court | 11/20/95 | |||
|
03S01-9410-CR-00094 Authoring Judge: Trial Court Judge: W. Lee Asbury |
Supreme Court | 11/13/95 | |||
|
03S01-9410-CR-00094 Authoring Judge: Trial Court Judge: |
Supreme Court | 11/13/95 | |||
|
State of Tennessee v. Gregory Adams Valentine 02S01-9410-CC-00070 Authoring Judge: Justice Aldolpho A. Birch, Jr. Trial Court Judge: Judge Julian P. Guinn Gregory Adams Valentine was convicted by a jury of unlawful possessoin of a Schedule VI Substance with intent to manufacture, deliever, or sell (a Class E felony) and unlawful possession of drug paraphernalia (a Class A misdemeanor). We granted his application for review pursuant to Rule 11, Tenn. R. Crim. P., in order to determine whether his testimony fulfilled the requirements of Rule 41 (g), Tenn.R.Crim.P., thereby preserving his right to challenge, on appeal, the admission of illegally obtain evidence.
|
Henry County | Supreme Court | 11/06/95 | ||
|
01S01-9403-CH-00026 Authoring Judge: Trial Court Judge: Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr. |
Davidson County | Supreme Court | 10/30/95 | ||
|
02S01-9407-CR-00044 Authoring Judge: Trial Court Judge: |
Supreme Court | 10/23/95 | |||
|
02S01-9407-CR-00044 Authoring Judge: Trial Court Judge: |
Supreme Court | 10/23/95 | |||
|
01S01-9502-FD-00024 Authoring Judge: Trial Court Judge: |
Hamilton County | Supreme Court | 10/23/95 | ||
|
01S01-9408-CH-00076 Authoring Judge: Trial Court Judge: |
Supreme Court | 10/16/95 | |||
|
State of Tennessee v. David Edward Howington 01S01-9407-CC-00073 Authoring Judge: Justice Adolpho A. Birch, Jr. Trial Court Judge: Judge John A. Gasaway The district attorney general refused to honor an informal immunity agreement1 made with David Edward Howington, the defendant. The reason stated for this refusal was the prosecutor's perception that Howington had not fulfilled his part of the bargain; that is, he had not testified truthfully at his preliminary hearing. He was subsequently tried and convicted of first-degree (felony) murder; he received a life sentence. |
Montgomery County | Supreme Court | 10/09/95 |