Rule 11: Supervision of the Judicial System.
This Rule is promulgated pursuant to the inherent power of this Court and particularly the following subsections of T.C.A. § 16-3-502, providing that the Supreme Court shall have the power:
“(1) To designate and assign temporarily any judge or chancellor to hold, or sit as a member of any court, of comparable dignity or equal or higher level, for any good and sufficient reason.
* * *
“(4) To take affirmative and appropriate action to correct or alleviate any imbalance in case loads among the various judicial circuits and chancery divisions of the state.
“(5) To take affirmative and appropriate action to correct or alleviate any condition or situation adversely affecting the administration of justice within the state.
“(6) To take all such other, further and additional action as may be necessary to the orderly administration of justice within the state, whether or not herein or elsewhere enumerated.”
Its purpose is as follows:
a. To correct or alleviate case load imbalances in the various judicial circuits and chancery divisions of the State.
b. To reduce docket congestion thereby holding trial delays to a minimum.
c. To promote the orderly and efficient administration of justice within the State.
II. Functional improvement of judicial system - Uniform procedures for data collection in civil and criminal matters in circuit, criminal, chancery, probate, and general sessions courts.
a. The judicial system of this State henceforth will function as an integrated unit under the direction and supervision of the Supreme Court.
b. Pursuant to its statutory duty to assist the Chief Justice of the Tennessee Supreme Court in improving the administration of justice, the Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC), working with a committee of representatives from the District Attorneys' General Conference, the Public Defenders' Conference, the Tennessee Judicial Conference, and the Clerks of Court Conference, has developed a procedure for the collection of uniform statistical data on matters filed in the Circuit, Criminal, and Chancery Courts of this state.
c. The Court finds that the data collection procedure designed by the Administrative Office of the Courts, in conjunction with the above-named committee, will aid in the accomplishment of the AOC's statutory duties, (T.C.A. § 16-3-803(g)), that the collection of statistical data by the AOC is specifically authorized by statute (T.C.A. § 16-3-803(i)); and that all judges, clerks of court, district attorneys general, district public defenders, other officers or employees of the courts, and all staff of offices or employees related to and serving the courts, are charged with complying with all requests for information from the Administrative Director of the Courts. Further, to ensure that comparable data is collected from all of the courts, data collection shall follow the standard definition of a case as set forth in T.C.A. § 16-1-117.
(1) Reporting Forms; Responsibility for Submission. Each clerk of a circuit, criminal, chancery, probate, general sessions, or municipal court with general sessions jurisdiction is responsible for submitting the forms required by this rule to the Technology Services Division of the Administrative Office of the Courts. Submission of forms specified by this rule shall be filed with the AOC not later than fifteen (15) days after the close of the month in which the case was filed and also the month in which it was disposed. Pursuant to the procedure, the AOC will provide a supply of the Civil Case Cover Sheets and the Criminal Case Cover Sheets, FORM NOS. TJIS/CI1 and TJIS/CR1, to the clerks of the Circuit, Criminal, Chancery, and Probate Courts. General Sessions Courts and Municipal Courts with general sessions jurisdiction will be provided with copies of FORM NOS. TJISGSCR1 and TJISGCCV1.
Clerks for courts of record other than juvenile court shall require that any complaint and summons filed to commence, reopen, or reinstate a civil action shall be accompanied by a Civil Case Cover Sheet for reopened cases, FORM NO. TJIS/CI3, which has been completed by the initiating party or his/her representative. The clerks shall also require a new Civil Case Cover Sheet (Reopened Cases) to be completed upon the grant of a new trial. Upon issuance of a final order disposing of the case, the clerk of court shall complete the disposition portion of the Civil Case Cover Sheet in full. A portion of the cover sheet containing this disposition information shall then be forwarded to the AOC on a monthly basis.
In addition, the clerks of courts of record other than juvenile shall require that any indictment, presentment or criminal information that initiates a criminal action in circuit or criminal court shall be accompanied by a Criminal Case Cover Sheet which has been completed by the district attorney general or his/her office. The clerks shall complete a new Criminal Case Cover Sheet upon the grant of a new trial, upon a case appealed from a lower court, or upon any petition to re-open or reinstate a criminal action. Upon issuance of a final order or judgment disposing of the case, the clerk of the court shall complete the disposition portion of the Criminal Case Cover Sheet for each docket number and all related charges. When all charges on the form have been disposed of, these forms shall be forwarded by the clerk of court, on a monthly basis, to the AOC.
Effective July 1, 2002, clerks' offices that are automated shall report statistical information monthly to the AOC by computer diskette or electronic mail attachment. In the event that a clerk is unable to do so due to technical difficulties, the clerk may report by sending the completed Criminal Case Cover Sheets and/or Civil Case Cover Sheets to the AOC.
(2) Administrative Director; Reports Public Record When Filed. All reports specified by these rules shall be public records. The Administrative Director of the Courts shall publish an annual compilation of the reports. All judges, court clerks, district attorneys general, district public defenders, and officers of the court shall cooperate with the Administrative Director to ensure the accuracy of the reports. As required by statute, the Administrative Director of the Courts shall annually report to the Chair of the Judicial Council, the Chair of the Judiciary Committee of the Senate, the Chair of the Judiciary Committee of the House of Representatives, and the Office of the Comptroller Division of Research and Accountability as to the failure of any judge, district attorney general, district public defender, or court clerk to comply with any of the reporting requirements.
Compliance with the reporting requirements includes, but is not limited to, submitting cover sheets within the fifteen (15) day time frame, submitting data every month, submitting data according to Implementation Manual guidelines, and using correct case numbering and definitions.
The Administrative Office of the Courts will provide written notification to any responsible reporting party found not to be in compliance with the statute or reporting guidelines. Written notification will detail the type of non- compliance and recommend the corrective action to be taken. If compliance is not achieved during the subsequent reporting period following notification, the Administrative Office of the Courts will no longer accept data from the office not in compliance, until such time as the error(s) are corrected. Notification of this action will be sent to all judges, district attorneys general, district public defenders, and court clerks within the district that the non-complying office is located in. Notification will also be sent to the District Attorney General Conference, the District Public Defender Conference, the Administrative Office of the Courts, and the County Officials Association of Tennessee. Any periods of non-compliance will also be reported in the annual report to the Judicial Council and the chairs of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees.
The Technology Services Division of the AOC shall provide an Implementation Manual that contains commentary and explanatory material pertaining to these rules and the report forms required by these rules. The Implementation Manual shall also contain a dictionary of terms to be used for case reporting, and how the terms will be defined for reporting purposes.
(3) Case Numbering. For purposes of this rule, the term "docket number" is defined as the separate and distinct identification number used for a case once it is filed in criminal, circuit, chancery, or probate court.
An incident is defined as all criminal activity occurring in a twenty-four (24) hour period, committed by a single defendant.
Charges of a related nature shall be defined as charges against a single defendant that may have more than one victim and that are similar such as, but not limited to, burglaries, drug offenses, or serial rape.
A court proceeding is defined as all court activity relating to a case from initial filing through disposition at a single level of court, i.e. general sessions, circuit, appellate, or Supreme Court.
A criminal case in a court of record, except juvenile court, is defined as a single charge or set of charges, arising out of a single incident involving the same victim(s), concerning a single defendant in one court proceeding. Accordingly, all charges consolidated into a single proceeding shall be included under one case number. In no instance should separate docket numbers be assigned to each charge when multiple charges are filed against a single defendant when said charges are intended to be handled in the same court proceeding. An appeal, probation revocation, or other post judgment proceeding is considered a separate case.
Worthless check cases shall be defined as all worthless checks filed by the same affiant against the same defendant within a twenty-four (24) period with each check as a separate charge under one docket number.
In criminal cases, each defendant shall be assigned a separate case (docket) number. In the alternative, separate defendant identifiers (such as letters) shall be added to the end of the original docket number to reflect co- defendants listed in a single case or charge. In instances where multiple defendants are identified by appending a letter to the docket number, all dispositions must be filed in an identical manner.
District attorneys general shall treat multiple incidents as a single incident for purposes of this rule when the charges are of a related nature and it is the district attorney general’s intention that all of the charges be handled in the same court proceeding.
Nothing in this rule is intended to alter or change in any way the Rules of Criminal Procedure governing severance and joinder.
The following diagram is provided as a guidance to properly number criminal cases.
A civil case shall be defined as all motions, petitions, claims, counter claims, or proceedings between the parties resulting from the initial filing until the case is disposed. A docket number will be assigned to a civil case upon filing. Until said cases are disposed all subsequent motions, petitions, claims, counter claims, or proceedings between the parties resulting from the initial filing will be handled under the assigned docket number and will not be assigned a new docket number. Once a civil case has been disposed and further actions occur on the case, the original case will be reopened using the same docket number under which it was originally filed. All subsequent motions, petitions, claims, counter claims, and proceedings relating to the reopened case will be handled under the one reopened case docket number until disposed. Any subsequent reopenings will still use the original docket number.
(4) General Sessions Reporting - Effective July 1, 2003, or sooner if practical, all general sessions courts and municipal courts with general sessions jurisdiction shall collect and report to the AOC all civil and criminal case data in accordance with the definitions provided under Part (3) above and guidelines published by the AOC.
Clerks of general sessions and municipal courts with general sessions jurisdiction shall file monthly reports with the AOC using FORM NOS. TJISGSCR1 and TJISGSCV1. Forms shall be submitted no later than the fifteenth (15) day of month following the month for which data is being reported.
General sessions courts and municipal courts with general sessions jurisdiction having an automated case management system shall report the collected data in accordance with the guidelines by diskette or e-mail submission.
III. Procedure for designation of presiding judges; assignment of cases; cases under advisement.
The following procedures are instituted in the thirty-one (31) judicial districts of this state.
a. Presiding judge. In each judicial district all judges will select one from their number to serve as presiding judge beginning September 1 of each year. In August of each year, the judges within each district shall assemble at the call of the presiding judge and select a successor to such presiding judge who shall serve until September 1 of the next succeeding year. A presiding judge shall be eligible to succeed him or herself. If upon any selection date the judges in any district fail to choose or are unable to agree upon the selection of a presiding judge, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court shall designate one of their number to serve.
b. Assignment of cases. Cases shall be assigned by, or under the supervision of the presiding judge, and all judges will hear and determine cases without regard to their nature or the category of cases normally heard, and determined by any particular judge.
The major objective of presiding judges should be to achieve an equitable distribution of the workload and an equal sharing of the bench and chamber time necessary to dispose of the total case load within acceptable time limits.
c. Cases under advisement. No case may be held under advisement in excess of sixty days and no motion, or other decision of the trial judge that delays the date of trial or final disposition in the trial court, shall be held under advisement for more than thirty days, absent the most compelling of reasons. (See T.C.A. § 20-9-506). A MOTION TO RENDER DECISION may be filed with the presiding judge and the circuit justice, or either of them by any attorney of record in a case, setting out the facts said to constitute a failure to comply with this rule.
d. It shall be the duty of the presiding judge to:
(1) Reduce docket delays and hold congestion to a minimum;
(2) Seek and maintain an equitable distribution of the workload and an equal sharing of the bench and chambers time necessary to dispose of the business of the district;
(3) Promote the orderly and efficient administration of justice within the district;
(4) Take immediate and affirmative action to correct or alleviate any caseload imbalance, or any condition adversely affecting the administration of justice within the district; and
(5) To effectuate the above duties, the presiding judge may assign cases to judges and chancellors within the district. In assigning cases, the presiding judge shall, whenever possible and not detrimental to the orderly and efficient administration of justice, give due regard to the court upon which the judge or chancellor serves, the judge's or chancellor's particular background, experience and preference and economy of judicial travel time.
e. If a presiding judge finds that he/she is unable to correct a caseload imbalance or reduce docket delays utilizing the available judges within the district, it shall be the affirmative duty of such presiding judge to contact the circuit justice for that judicial district. (See T.C.A. § 16-2-509).
IV. Assignment of judges.
The director of the Administrative Office of the Courts has been instructed to make a continuing survey of case loads, docket congestion and related matters.
Circuit and criminal judges and chancellors will be assigned from time to time by order of the Supreme Court to hold court in other circuits and divisions when necessary to promote the orderly and efficient administration of justice.
V. Circuit justices.
In order to supervise the procedures herein set forth and to carry out the general supervisory power of this Court, each member of the Supreme Court has been designated as Circuit Justice for the judicial districts as follows:
Circuit No. 1
Circuit Justice: Gary R. Wade
The 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th Judicial Districts.
Circuit No. 2
Circuit Justice: Sharon G. Lee
The 9th, 10th, 11th, 12th, 13th and 31st Judicial Districts.
Circuit No. 3
Circuit Justice: William C. Koch, Jr.
The 14th, 15th, 16th, 18th, 19th and 20th Judicial Districts.
Circuit No. 4
Circuit Justice: Cornelia A. Clark
The 17th, 21st, 22nd, 23rd, 24th and 26th Judicial Districts.
Circuit No. 5
Circuit Justice: Janice M. Holder
The 25th, 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th Judicial Districts.
It shall be the responsibility of the Circuit Justices to aid, assist and supervise in the responsibility of this rule, under the Chief Justice who is recognized to be the executive head of the Judicial Department of Tennessee.
VI. Administration of the Civil Legal Representation of Indigents Fund.
a. (1) Revenue deposited into the Civil Legal Representation of Indigents Fund in the Office of the State Treasurer, pursuant to Public Acts, 1995, Chapter 550 and Public Acts, 1999, Chapter 502, shall be paid quarterly by the Treasurer to the four not-for- profit legal organizations listed below, in the corresponding percentage listed by each organization. This funding percentage, like the funding percentage to each organization within the Legal Services Corporation, is based on the poverty populations of the service area of each organization. The four organizations and their respective percentages are:
Legal Aid Society of East Tennessee 31.73%
Legal Aid Society of Middle Tennessee and the Upper Cumberlands 37.81%
Memphis Area Legal Services 20.77%
West Tennessee Legal Services 9.69%
(2) Pursuant to Public Acts, 2001, Chapter 456, Section 7, Paragraph (2), twenty-five percent (25%) of the proceeds deposited into the Civil Legal Representation of Indigents Fund, as a result of Public Chapter 456, shall be paid to the Tennessee /Alliance for Legal Services, a statewide non-profit organization providing continuing legal education, technology support, planning assistance, resource development and other support to organizations delivering civil legal representation to indigents. The remainder of the proceeds deposited in the Fund pursuant to Chapter 456, Section 7, Paragraph (2) shall be paid to the four not-for-profit organizations listed in a(1) in the corresponding percentages.
b. Funds paid to the not-for-profit organizations listed above shall be used for expenses incurred in the legal representation of poor persons in civil matters by either staff attorneys of the organizations or volunteer attorneys in pro bono programs organized and administered by local bar associations in this State.
c. Each of the not-for-profit organizations receiving funding shall report annually to the Administrative Director of the Courts as to the allocation and expenditure of the funding received. The report shall be prepared in a manner prescribed by the Administrative Director of the Courts, which shall include a description of legal aid activities provided in each county, and a description of the efforts of the legal aid organization designed to foster and encourage the involvement of volunteer attorneys in the delivery of legal services to the poor.
d. Each not-for-profit organization receiving monies from the Fund shall provide a copy of its audited financial statements for the preceding calendar year to the Administrative Director of the Courts on or before June 30th of each year.
e. All unexpended or uncommitted funds received by a designated not-for-profit organization during its fiscal year shall be returned by the organization to the State Treasurer, which monies will be distributed the following year to the participating organization in accordance with paragraph (a).
f. A designated organization's receipt of monies from the Fund shall be conditioned upon the organization's adherence to the underlying principles of the American Bar Association's Standards for Providers of Civil Legal Services to the Poor.
g. The Administrative Director of the Courts annually shall prepare and distribute to the members of the Supreme Court and to the Judiciary Committees of the General Assembly:
(1) a report detailing the expenditure of monies from the Fund;
(2) a copy of any rules and policies adopted by the Supreme Court governing the expenditure and application of monies from the Fund.
VII. Courts to be Open; Substitute Judges.
a. Pursuant to the inherent powers of the Supreme Court ( see Art. I, § 1, Tennessee Constitution, Tenn. Code Ann. § 16-3-503, Tenn. Code Ann. § 16-3-504) and in discharge of the Court's responsibility to ensure the harmonious, efficient and uniform operation of the judicial system ( see Tenn. Code Ann. § 16-3-501), this rule is adopted for the purpose of implementing the provisions of Tenn. Code Ann. § 16-2-509; § 16-3-502(2) and (3); § 17-2-118 and Tenn. Code Ann. § 17-2-201 et seq. and § 17-2-304 so as to accomplish the mandate of Art. I, § 17 of the Tennessee Constitution.1
1This rule is promulgated pursuant to the Court's rule making power. It is not an adjudication of the validity or meaning of any of these statutes, and it does not address the meaning, validity, or constitutionality of the statute here pertinent.
b. Courts to be Open. Art. I, § 17 of the Tennessee Constitution provides that “[a]ll courts shall be open; and every man for an injury . shall have remedy by due course of law, and right and justice administered without sale, denial, or delay.”In furtherance of this constitutional mandate, it is the policy of the Tennessee Judicial Department that all courts of this state shall be open and available for the transaction of business except on Saturdays, Sundays, legal holidays, and during meetings of the Tennessee Judicial Conference required by law. This rule sets forth the procedure which shall be followed when a judge of a trial court of record is absent.
c. Substitute Judges. Where a judge of a trial court of record fails to attend or is unable to hold court, as provided in Tenn. Code Ann. § 17-2-118, the following procedure shall be followed, in the sequence designated, for the selection of a substitute judge.
(1) The judge shall seek interchange in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. § 17-2-201 et seq.;
(2) The judge shall apply to the presiding judge of the judicial district to effect an interchange with a judge of that judicial district in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. § 16-2-509(d);
(3) The presiding judge of the judicial district shall effect an interchange with a judge from another judicial district in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. § 16-2-509(e);
(4) The presiding judge shall request from the director of the Administrative Office of the Courts the designation of a judge by the chief justice, in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 16-3-502(3)(A) and 17-2-110.
d. Only if the procedures set forth above fail to provide a judge to preside over the docket or case will a judge appoint a lawyer to preside as a substitute judge pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 17-2-118. Appointments pursuant to this section will conform to the following requirements:
(1) An attorney who is appointed substitute judge must possess all the qualifications of a judge, including the age and residency requirements; and the attorney must be in good standing under the rules of this Court. The substitute judge shall be subject to the applicable provisions of the Code of Judicial Conduct, including Canon 8.
(2) The substitute judge shall take an oath of office as provided in Tenn. Code Ann. § 17-2-120, and the substitute judge shall certify compliance with this rule by affixing his or her signature to the consent form which is appended to this rule.
(3) The authority of a substitute judge to fix fees pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 17-2-118 is limited to cases in which the exact amount of the fees is set by statute.
(4) The substitute judge must ensure that all litigants who are present at the beginning of each proceeding give their consent to the use of a substitute judge in their case. All litigants who are present at the beginning of the proceedings in a case and the attorneys of record for all parties who consent to the service of the substitute judge must complete Part B of the substitute judge consent form. Without such consent, the substitute judge shall not preside on that case. Part C of the substitute judge consent form must be completed by the substitute judge in each case on which that judge presides.
(5) The absent judge must complete Part A of the substitute judge consent form. The judge must specify the reason for his or her absence. If the judge cites absence for a cause other than a reason listed in Tenn. Code Ann. § 17-2-118(a), the specific reason for the absence must be set forth on the form.
(6) The clerk of the court shall certify that the appointment was made and that the substitute judge took the statutory oath of office and that the oath of office was filed in the clerk's office. The certification shall be made on Part D of the substitute judge consent form.
(7) At the end of each month, all substitute judge consent forms will be transmitted by the presiding judge of the judicial district to the Administrative Office of the Courts, Suite 600, Nashville City Center, 511 Union Street, Nashville, Tennessee 37243-0607, where they will be available for public inspection during regular business hours. Such forms shall be maintained on file at the Administrative Office of the Courts for at least eight (8) years after they are received.
e. This rule shall become effective on December 9, 1996.
IN THE _________ COURT OF
___________ COUNTY, TENNESSEE
v. ) No. _______
SUBSTITUTE JUDGE CONSENT FORM
NOTICE: WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF ALL LITIGANTS OR THEIR ATTORNEYS, THE SUBSTITUTE JUDGE SHALL NOT PRESIDE ON THIS CASE.
Part A: (to be filled out by the absent judge)
1. Date(s) of Absence(s): _____________________
2. Reason(s) for Absence(s) ( Judge must give specific reason):
Signature of Absent Judge Date
Part B: (to be completed by the parties)
NOTICE TO PARTIES:
The substitute judge appointed to hear your case has not been elected by the citizens or appointed by the governor. You are not required to accept the service of a substitute judge. Without the consent of all parties the substitute judge shall not preside and the cause will be scheduled for another date. Consent must be granted by the parties who are present but may be granted by the attorney of record of any party who is not present at the beginning of the proceeding.
By signing this form, you consent to the use of the below-named substitute judge in this proceeding.
Signature of Attorney of Record Signature of Attorney of Record
If there were no parties present at the beginning, the substitute judge will write “not present”across the above signature lines.
Part C: (to be completed by the substitute judge)
Name of Substitute Judge: _____________________
I, ___________ do solemnly swear that I will support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of Tennessee, and that I will administer justice without respect of persons, and do equal rights to the poor and the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge all the duties incumbent upon me as a judge to the best of my abilities.
Signature of Substitute Judge Date
Part D: (to be completed by the clerk of the court)
I, ___________, clerk of the above court certify that on the _____ day of _______, 20___, the Honorable ___________ appointed the Honorable ___________ to preside on the above case. I further certify that the substitute judge subscribed to the statutory oath of office before entering upon the duties of that office and that oath has been filed with the records of my office.
[As amended by order entered November 25, 1987; by order entered November 1, 1990, effective January 1, 1991; by order entered December 14, 1994, effective January 1, 1995; by order entered February 27, 1995; by order entered October 4, 1995; by order entered December 3, 1996; by order entered January 28, 1997; by order entered February 17, 2000; by order entered June 28, 2001; by order filed December 18, 2001, by order filed October 18, 2005; by order filed October 30, 2006; by order filed June 29, 2007; by order filed September 1, 2010; and by orders filed January 4, 2012 and June 29, 2012, effective July 1, 2012.]